Federal Judge Rejects Request by DOJ to Pause Deadlines in Asylum Case

A federal judge has refused to pause the deadlines in a federal court in DC, a request made by the Department of Justice Department due to the partial Government shutdown, the CNN reported.

Judge Randolph Moss stated that those challenging the asylum restrictions view this as a case related to human safety and as such, despite the shutdown, deadlines for case filings remain in place. The next briefs are due to the court on January 4.
On Wednesday, government attorneys asked the court to delay “all briefing deadlines” in a lawsuit brought on behalf of six people who were barred from seeking asylum because they entered the United States illegally. Trump signed a proclamation in November that attempted to prevent migrants who cross the southern border illegally from seeking asylum. However, soon after, a judge in California blocked the administration’s policy.
The Justice Department told the court that absent an appropriation, attorneys and the federal defendants are prohibited from working, even on a voluntary basis, except in very limited circumstances, including “emergencies involving the safety of human life or the protection of property.”
Similar DOJ requests were made in multiple ongoing federal civil litigation cases on Wednesday. The government asked Moss to indefinitely delay the briefing schedule and production of an administrative record until attorneys were allowed to resume usual litigation activities, adding that they “greatly regret” any disruption to the case.
In his order, Moss quotes from administration shutdown staffing plans, saying there are people working in the immigration courts office as well as DHS.
“The Court further notes that, according to government reports, 48% of employees from the Executive Office for Immigration Review are excepted ‘to process all immigration cases and appeals involving detained aliens,’ … and approximately 91% of Customs and Border Protection employees and 81% of Immigration and Customs Enforcement employees will be retained during a lapse in appropriations.”
During the shutdown, immigration courts will proceed as scheduled with “detained” cases — hearings of people currently in detention. However, “non-detained” cases will be rescheduled after funding resumes, according to the Justice Department website.
The Justice Department declined to comment on Moss’s ruling, and the plaintiffs in the case did not respond to CNN’s request for comment.
Moss did agree to one aspect of the Justice Department’s request — to produce the administrative record that would be “identical” to the document produced in the California federal court asylum lawsuit. Both cases challenge the administration’s asylum restrictions but raise different legal arguments.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.