Jeremy Hunt, the British foreign minister, arrived in Washington last week for a whirlwind of meetings dominated by a critical question: Should Britain risk its relationship with Beijing and agree to the Trump administration’s request to ban Huawei, China’s leading telecommunications producer, from building its next-generation computer and phone networks?
According to The New York Times, Britain is not the only American ally feeling the heat. In Poland, officials are also under pressure from the United States to bar Huawei from building its fifth generation, or 5G, network. Trump officials suggested that future deployments of American troops – including the prospect of a permanent base labeled “Fort Trump” – could hinge on Poland’s decision.
And a delegation of American officials showed up last spring in Germany, where most of Europe’s giant fiber-optic lines connect and Huawei wants to build the switches that make the system hum. Their message: Any economic benefit of using cheaper Chinese telecom equipment is outweighed by the security threat to the NATO alliance.
Over the past year, Washington has embarked on a stealthy, occasionally threatening, global campaign to prevent Huawei and other Chinese firms from participating in the most dramatic remaking of the plumbing that controls the internet since it sputtered into being, in pieces, 35 years ago.
On Monday, China’s envoy to the EU also noted that Huawei was the victim of slander as Western governments try to hamper the Chinese telecommunications giant’s effort to deploy its technology worldwide, The South China Morning Post writes.
“It is not helpful to make slander, discrimination, pressure, coercion or speculation against anyone else,” Ambassador Zhang Ming told the Financial Times. “Now someone is sparing no effort to fabricate a security story about Huawei,” he said.
The Trump administration asserts that the world is engaged in a new arms race – one that involves technology, rather than conventional weaponry, but poses just as much danger to America’s national security. In an age when the most powerful weapons, short of nuclear arms, are cyber-controlled, whichever country dominates 5G will gain an economic, intelligence and military edge for much of this century, the Times adds.
The transition to 5G, already beginning in prototype systems in cities from Dallas to Atlanta, is likely to be more revolutionary than evolutionary. What consumers will notice first is that the network is faster – data should download almost instantly, even over cellphone networks.
It is the first network built to serve the sensors, robots, autonomous vehicles and other devices that will continuously feed each other vast amounts of data, allowing factories, construction sites and even whole cities to be run with less moment-to-moment human intervention. It will also enable greater use of virtual reality and artificial intelligence tools.
But what is good for consumers is also good for intelligence services and cyberattackers. The 5G system is a physical network of switches and routers. But it is more reliant on layers of complex software that are far more adaptable, and constantly updating, in ways invisible to users – much as an iPhone automatically updates while charging overnight. That means whoever controls the networks controls the information flow – and may be able to change, reroute or copy data without users’ knowledge, the Times writes.